PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
^IMXL vs. VNRG.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


^IMXLVNRG.L
YTD Return21.14%14.44%
1Y Return27.50%19.33%
3Y Return (Ann)7.07%10.54%
5Y Return (Ann)14.07%13.39%
Sharpe Ratio2.031.75
Daily Std Dev12.68%11.45%
Max Drawdown-48.36%-26.12%
Current Drawdown-3.13%-1.41%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between ^IMXL and VNRG.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

^IMXL vs. VNRG.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ^IMXL achieves a 21.14% return, which is significantly higher than VNRG.L's 14.44% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
10.91%
10.31%
^IMXL
VNRG.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^IMXL vs. VNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^IMXL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^IMXL, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.502.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^IMXL, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.002.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^IMXL, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.901.001.101.201.301.401.501.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^IMXL, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^IMXL, currently valued at 9.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.009.54
VNRG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VNRG.L, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.502.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VNRG.L, currently valued at 2.99, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.002.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VNRG.L, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.901.001.101.201.301.401.501.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VNRG.L, currently valued at 3.02, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.003.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VNRG.L, currently valued at 10.84, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0010.84

^IMXL vs. VNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^IMXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which roughly equals the VNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ^IMXL and VNRG.L.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.03
2.16
^IMXL
VNRG.L

Drawdowns

^IMXL vs. VNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IMXL drawdown since its inception was -48.36%, which is greater than VNRG.L's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IMXL and VNRG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-3.13%
-0.55%
^IMXL
VNRG.L

Volatility

^IMXL vs. VNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.33%
4.27%
^IMXL
VNRG.L